The University is committed to fostering the leadership of its academic officers and enhancing their effectiveness in a constructive way. Performance appraisals are a means to support this commitment and the broad goals of managerial accountability. At its meeting held on January 17, 2012, AAPC passed a resolution that there would be an annual assessment of the said academic officers starting from 2012. Annual exercises were duly conducted in 2012 and onwards.

The evaluative review incorporates the use of a standardized paper-based survey comprised of a common set of questions. This survey is conducted annually for input on a voluntary and unnamed basis. All members of the academic full-time staff are invited to participate in the survey (except for the person being reviewed in the corresponding survey). Faculty Offices are requested to issue the questionnaires in due course.

Survey on Performance of Faculty Deans  
icon 


All views, a statistical summary, together with consolidated comments collected by means of the survey form will be collated by the University Secretariat and forwarded to the Vice-Chancellor in strict confidence, without identifying any participating individual. The use of the information will be at the discretion of the Vice-Chancellor and the Provost for reference in performance management.

2015 Procedure

By April 2

Faculty Office distributes the survey forms and pre-addressed envelopes to academic staff, under cover of this memo.

By May 11

Academic staff members return survey forms to the University Secretariat.

May 12 – June 5

University Secretariat collates feedback/comments from academic staff members for onward transmission to the Vice-Chancellor and the Provost.

By June 8

Provost sends the consolidated feedback/comments to Deans being reviewed.

June 8 – 12

Dean being reviewed prepares for summative meetings to be held among individual Deans, the Vice-Chancellor and the Provost tentatively scheduled for June 2015 to discuss, among other things, the developmental and evaluative outcomes. Deans may provide written submission beforehand.

June 15 – 30

Dean being reviewed meets the Vice Chancellor and the Provost to discuss Strategic and Budget Plan Reviews/Updates.


Survey on Performance of Department Chairpersons/School Directors  
icon 


All views, statistical summaries, together with additional comments collected by means of the survey form, will be collated by staff in the Faculty Office and forwarded to the Faculty Dean and the Vice Chancellor via the Provost in strict confidence, without identifying any participating individual. Feedback will be given to Department Chairpersons and School Directors for their continuous improvement. The use of the information will be at the discretion of the Vice-Chancellor for reference in performance management.

2015 Procedure

By April 2

Faculty Office distributes the survey forms and pre-addressed envelopes to academic staff, under cover of this memo.

By April 24

Academic staff members return survey forms to the Faculty Office.

April 27-May 5

Faculty Office collates feedback/comments from academic staff members for onward transmission to the Dean.

May 6-20

Dean meets with Department Chairman being reviewed to relay and address the feedback/comments collected from academic staff.

By May 21

Dean sends the collated feedback/comments from academic staff members to the Vice-Chancellor via the Provost.


This page was last updated on March 26, 2015.